Hindustan Unilever Ltd. CREAM™ Report – Corporate Rating





Hindustan Unilever Ltd. CREAM™ Report – Corporate Rating

Synopsis of CREAM™ Report – Corporate Rating
crème de la crème of India Inc. of Hindustan Unilever Ltd.

The Methodology

Keynes on Animal Spirits: “Animal Spirits: – Even apart from the instability due to speculation, there is the instability due to the characteristic of human nature that a large proportion of our positive activities depend on spontaneous optimism rather than mathematical expectations, whether moral or hedonistic or economic. Most, probably, of our decisions to do something positive, the full consequences of which will be drawn out over many days to come, can only be taken as the result of animal spirits – a spontaneous urge to action rather than inaction, and not as the outcome of a weighted average of quantitative benefits multiplied by quantitative probabilities.

I worked on the same and in order to satisfy the demands set by the statement I brought in the ‘pole-shift theory of Management’. I created a Subject-Object distinction of Qualitative and Quantitative elements of Corporate Management. In it the denominator I changed to the Subject and the numerator the Action or Inaction of the Subject on an Object.

The Subject is Intangible of pulsating energy. The Object is inert but of non-pulsating energy. Unless the Subject takes effort to collide with the Object the inert Object doesn’t move, which is Action. Action or Inaction obtains a binary value of 1 and 0. Intangible being 1 binary value for deciding on spontaneous urge related to any Object is either 1 or 0. Object being inert the common denominator facilitates measuring Action covering a single Process Block to the entire economy. The common denominator clue I took from the statement ‘convert n-dimensional problems to n problems of one dimension’. The common denominator is the spontaneous urge, the intangible, the pulsating energy.

Continuing I worked on the n-dimensional problems, the Object.

The Object is not an Object unless it is created, our Constitution or IPRs, patents etc. So it goes through a process of being created. Any Object whether man-made or Natural has identical Creative Process, a child or a diamond or a an IPR. Creative Process moves linearly in 6 stages to be called a substance. Parliament is more of Creative Process than Action Process bringing out Policies enabling Action on the created Policy.

Action process is unique to the Quality of the substance created be it Constitution of India or manufactured patented goods in infinite succession. If there is a road block on Action for the created policy it is insentient, like UNCAC ratified but not functional.

I brought down n-dimensional problems to two: related to any task it is of 2 dimensions Creative Process or Action Process.

I created Corporate Atomic Structure consisting of Policies [Protons], Practices[Electrons] and The Society [Neutrons] where the Society is packed into the Board forming a nucleus whereas Practices spin around the nucleus. Our Companies Act with Code for Independent Directors represent the Society, who like Neutrons do no change the identity but adds mass.

Every material event, an event where the pulsating energy collides with a non-pulsating one creates energy. Shrinking n-dimensional problems to two we focus only on two at a time in either of the processes – Action or Inaction by 1 dimension [pulsating energy] to arrive at Return on Intangible, which is either 1 or 0. Adding every Process Block and averaging it, by Integer only as to the stage of completion, any number of disparate Process Blocks could be grouped under a single banner. It makes no difference between Agriculture or manufacturing as the criterion is set, as to know whether the pulsating energy related to the Object has taken Action or not, be it a potter or a nuclear scientist.

I have done the Corporate Rating of Hindustan Unilever Ltd. on this principle with Ethical Responsibility being aligned with Fiscal Responsibility as a primary criterion to arrive at the Rating for 5+ years beginning 2008-09. This principle is valid for entire economy that we could arrive at a Country Rating.

I am pleased to send this presentation HULCREAM™ Report – Corporate Rating, crème de la crème of India Corporate, a synopsis of measuring an Organisation by Subject-Object distinction of Corporate Management. CREAM stands for Corporate Governance, Risk Management, Earnings, Accounting Quality and Management Quality. The main report consisting of 350 pages of 189+ Process Blocks with no one issue area occupying more than a page, it is an exhaustive analysis for a single company deriving a single rating for each year. The ratings signify what is the current status and calculates an Index of Inactivity based on the optimum level of achievement which is 5 for every Process Block. Index of Inactivity, which is absence of Intangible or absence of pulsating energy or effort or inaction, signifies the gap where Action is warranted. Any additional input towards the optimum is the energy added satisfying the equation e = mc².

Isolating problems is the key element of Subject-Object relationship once established. For example, control of inflation. Create an Object as a strategy statement for Action on controlling inflation with any number of process blocks each owned by a team of individuals. The team consists of 5 – 1[one] member from Ethical Responsibility Management and 4[four] from Fiscal Responsibility Management that consists of 1. Managerial Force, 2. Operating Force, 3. Technology and 4. Finance. dT/dT series of Tasks in Time should be at the speed of 5 by real-time monitoring of the control measures. Each unit of effort put in creates pure energy and adds mass at the same time, vice-versa as the Object is moved from one space to the other at the collision point.

The principle is valid for all and useful to Planning Commission and RBI, a simple tracking device for the entire economy.

Please see the presentation HUL- CREAM™ Report – Corporate Rating and the conclusions derived.I am sure my work in turn brings self-governance, the purpose that I had stated in CREAM™ Report – Corporate Rating, aligning Ethical Responsibility with Fiscal Responsibility as National Culture.
Corporate Rating of Hindustan Unilever, India including Code of Business Principles (CoBP) of both Unilever and HUL India. 340 pages of analysis of a single company, a rating system covering 189 Process Blocks. Unique in presenting Return on Intangible for each Process Block that Rating Agencies would surely follow – Rating of Corporate as well as Governments.

The methodology adopted reverses the denominator, from Return on Investment to Return on Intangible, a pole shift theory of management. Useful for companies that want to know and understand the meaning of Capitalism and how best that could be applied. That’s it, capitalism the denominator is human spirits, an enthusiasm of spontaneous action, rather than inaction, and certainly not as the outcome of a weighted average of quantitative benefits multiplied by quantitative probabilities, as Keynes describes Animal Spirits in its right perspective.
This analysis of a major organization should interest the world over, corporate as well as Government. What is crucial is to know that a material event is the collision point of Ethical and Fiscal Responsibility bringing the abstractions into reality, acknowledge value where value is due, and deconstruct what is valueless.

The CREAM™ Report – Corporate Rating, crème de la crème of India Corporate rates Hindustan Unilever on
1.Corporate Governance,
2. Risk Management
3. Earnings
4. Accounting Quality
5. Management Quality.

What CREAM™ Report – Corporate Rating does is to shrink the quantitative data to merge with Qualitative elements of Corporate Management by Subject-Object distinction. It is a beauty and simple. This unique rendering of aligning Ethical Responsibility with Fiscal Responsibility is made possible by Subject-Object Distinction of Qualitative and Quantitative Elements of Corporate management. If CoBP is rated, so are the Balance Sheet and Profitability statement, merging all to a single rating system for the Company.

The Subject is the pulsating energy and the Object the non-pulsating ones. The Subject either moves the Object or he/she does not, i.e., Action and Inaction. The denominator is Intangible the pulsating energy, the numerator Action or Inaction for an Object. By doing so CREAM strategy converts n-dimensional problems to n-problems of one dimension.

Secondly there are only two processes – Creative Process or Action process – relative to an Object. Either you create an Object or make use of it. During the creative process every man-made or Nature substance follow an identical pattern till it becomes tangible.
Hence n-dimensional problems are brought to a single dimension of binary value, either you are in the process of creation or moving the inanimate object from one space to the other. There are only two processes for Corporate management – of Policies and Practices. Nothing more to add.

Jayaraman Rajah Iyer

2012 in review



The WordPress.com stats helper monkeys prepared a 2012 annual report for this blog.

Here’s an excerpt:

600 people reached the top of Mt. Everest in 2012. This blog got about 3,300 views in 2012. If every person who reached the top of Mt. Everest viewed this blog, it would have taken 6 years to get that many views.

Click here to see the complete report.

 

Follow me on LinkedIn:
Follow on LinkedIn

Subscribe to my Podcasts:
Apple Channel https://apple.co/36HUfzH
Apple Connect: https://lnkd.in/eJEDT7E
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3qzEAM1
Stitcher: https://lnkd.in/eAUS9-E
Google Play: https://bit.ly/3vZ6ulT
Reason: https://reason.fm/podcast/cream-ratings

Download Files at:

Homepage

Pole Shift Theory of Management for Investors in People (IIP) Standard







Pole Shift Theory of Management for Investors in People (IIP) Standard critically looks at IIP and exhorts to shift the focus of analysis from ‘effect’ on Objects to ’cause’ of energy force i.e the Subject.

School of Management, Cranfield University Research Study of The Investors in People (IIP) Standard states: Quote: The Investors in People (IIP) Standard is a UK quality standard introduced in 1991. Currently about 31% of the workforce are employed either by organisations that are recognised as Investors in People employers or organisations working towards achieving recognition status. IIPUK’s Delivery Partners currently work with almost 40,000 organisations employing over 7.5 million people and engage with new organisations on a daily basis, which highlights its potential impact on the UK economy. The Standard’s main objective is to improve organisational performance through the management and development of people. Unquote.

Organisational performance through management of Intangible Value Capital, as suggested by IBCM© Research would improve substantially with measurable valuation of Action and Inaction of tasks, where there is no bottom-up or top-down hierarchical approach to management as Investors look at an organisation as a single force energy represented by People.

Jayaraman Rajah Iyer

Follow me on LinkedIn:
Follow on LinkedIn

Subscribe to my Podcasts:
Apple Channel https://apple.co/36HUfzH
Apple Connect: https://lnkd.in/eJEDT7E
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3qzEAM1
Stitcher: https://lnkd.in/eAUS9-E
Google Play: https://bit.ly/3vZ6ulT
Reason: https://reason.fm/podcast/cream-ratings

Download Files at:

Homepage

Reviving Keynes Animal Spirits for your business





Reviving Keynes Animal Spirits for your business:

Measuring by Return on Intangible

Recently (July 2012) Dr. Manmohan Singh, Prime Minister of India declared “Reverse the climate of pessimism… revive the animal spirits in the country’s economy,” It isContinue reading “Reviving Keynes Animal Spirits for your business”

Planning & Budget: Measuring by Return On Intangible





Corporates and Governments: Convert a n-dimensional problem into n problems of one dimension:

Planning & Budget: Measuring by Return On Intangible

From Return on Investment that companies are accustomed to, it is Return on Intangible that IBCM© Research recommends. Compact your infinite numbers to a single rating system and move forward attracting best investments. So in case of countries where Budget system is elaborate but lacks follow-up. Return on Intangible is as applicable to governments as they are for Corporates.  Continue reading “Planning & Budget: Measuring by Return On Intangible”

Investment Decisions for Pension Funds By Intangible Value Capital





Investment Decisions for Pension Funds
By
Intangible Value Capital

OECD Study on Pension Funds:

Recent OECD study on Pension Funds of USD20.1 trillion reveals the crack in its corporate equity investment strategy and its very future. My report pinpoints the Continue reading “Investment Decisions for Pension Funds By Intangible Value Capital”

DIY – Corporate Rating – #CSR Integrated





An IBCM© Research Presentation:

DIY – Corporate Rating – CSR integrated – by IBCM© Research is unique in the world of management, derived by Intangible

IBCM© Research integrates Tangible results with Intangible action plan keeping track of accomplishments on Real-time.

 

Continue reading “DIY – Corporate Rating – #CSR Integrated”

Risk Appetite & Risk Culture: No Scope at all for Process of Knowledge without Intangible





 

Rating System for Banking and Financial Services Industry:

Not since 1966 when Cost Audit emerged that another idea could have impacted corporate management as SEBI’s Mandatory Grading. Volumes could be written on the contribution of Cost Audit to management efficiency whereas mandatory grading can be best described as for want of a good rating system opportunity,  for sustainability of – efficiency, value system and profits – is frittered away.

Letter to The Chairman, SEBI – Securities and Exchange Board of India for ‘an objective risk rating system’, enjoining to create a rating system of one’s own and eliminate reliance on external ratings.

Continue reading “Risk Appetite & Risk Culture: No Scope at all for Process of Knowledge without Intangible”

Who is the inside trader – Rajat Gupta, Rajaratnam, Goldman Sachs or Warren Buffett?





Who is the inside trader – Rajat Gupta, Rajaratnam, Goldman Sachs or Warren Buffett?

1. Good intentions

Growing inequality in the U.S. is not only killing the economy, but it threatens to undermine the nation’s values and identity. America today can no longer regard itself as the land of opportunity that it once was, with equality of opportunity less evident than in Europe. – Joseph Stiglitz

The occupy Wall Street movement to me is a great example. In this case unfortunately is not the solution but people say ‘enough is enough’. I want solutions and it should send a strong message. – Paul Polson, Chairman Unilever

Preet Bharara, who has been leading the Obama administration’s ongoing crackdown on insider trading, said in a statement released after the conviction that Gupta “once stood at the apex of the international business community. Today, he stands convicted of securities fraud. He achieved remarkable success and stature, but he threw it all away. Having fallen from respected insider to convicted inside trader, Mr. Gupta has now exchanged the lofty board room for the prospect of a lowly jail cell.” – TIME

We can’t solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them. ~ Albert EinsteinContinue reading “Who is the inside trader – Rajat Gupta, Rajaratnam, Goldman Sachs or Warren Buffett?”

If not now, when? If not you, then who?





Corporate Critical Density

1. What is the Energy force of your organization?

The latest jargon around corporate offices is sustainability, isn’t it? What profits of yours are sustainable? What energy have you derived from your strategies, from your initiatives? Or what have you lost by interacting with the government, with the competition? What does a stakeholder got to do in your day-to-day dispensation of practices and policies? What is your position in the corporate world compared to the best? Will you ever be noticed if you better the best? Who is the best? If not you, then who? If not now, when? What is sustainable of your efficiency? Of your values? Of your profits?  What values distinguish between what is valuable and valueless? What abstractions are brought into reality, acknowledged for value where value is due, and deconstructed the valueless?Continue reading “If not now, when? If not you, then who?”